Legal Opinion

Chezum v. Kreighbaum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1892No. 496PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J. —

Respondent executed and delivered to appellant a contract in writing in the words and figures as follows, to wit:

“Nov. 29, 1889. Slaughter.

This is to certify tha that I have this day Given E. O. Chezum the exclusive sale of my lande for 60 days — E J of SE £ an South W I- of SE \ Sec. 17 town 22 No. R 4 E to be soldé for $6000., tow $2000, chash $2000. Interest semiannually one yeare and 2000 two years, and said Chezum must git his comition above that. I hereby reserve 10 acres to be selected by me of the forty next the beche. N. Kreighbaum.”

A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turnley v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  2. Blanchard v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Greenough v. WillcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Gray v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Louva v. WordenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Closner & Sprague v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Craig v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API