Chezum v. Kreighbaum
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J. —
Respondent executed and delivered to appellant a contract in writing in the words and figures as follows, to wit:
“Nov. 29, 1889. Slaughter.
This is to certify tha that I have this day Given E. O. Chezum the exclusive sale of my lande for 60 days — E J of SE £ an South W I- of SE \ Sec. 17 town 22 No. R 4 E to be soldé for $6000., tow $2000, chash $2000. Interest semiannually one yeare and 2000 two years, and said Chezum must git his comition above that. I hereby reserve 10 acres to be selected by me of the forty next the beche. N. Kreighbaum.”
A…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Turnley v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
- Blanchard v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greenough v. WillcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Gray v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Louva v. WordenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Closner & Sprague v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Craig v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.