Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Ott

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1969No. 68-323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

Ott, the defendant, charged Mrs. Floyd and her employer Hank Corsmeier with the issuance of a worthless check with intent to defraud. The information issued upon Ott’s affidavit was later nol pressed as to Mrs. Floyd by an assistant county solicitor because investigation revealed that she “was employed as a secretary and was one of several secretaries who co-signed checks as a matter of control. She was not a partner but merely an employee and she was granted no discretion in signing the checks.”

This malicious prosecution action ensued and came to trial. During the presentation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brown v. DewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Rotberg v. Dodwell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Segars v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Ricks v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Southern Wood Industries, Inc. v. Florida Carolina Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheldon Greene and Associates, Inc. v. Williams Island AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Schurr v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Wilfork v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Akdoruk v. Advanced Jet Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Porro v. FrancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API