Legal Opinion

Peck v. Toland

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Porter P. Peck against Frank-J. Toland. From an order refusing to dissolve an attachment, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the circuit court, made on the 8th day of December, 1909, overruling the motion of the defendant to dissolve an attachment.

On the 17th day of March, 1909, the plaintiff instituted an, action in the circuit court of Minnehaha county to recover of the defendant the sum of $593.83, alleged to be due him for rent of certain premises in the city of Sioux Falls. At the time of instituting the action, the plaintiff, upon-affidavit and bond, caused a writ of attachment to be issued against the property of the defendant, which was duly executed, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. BierleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Trebilcock v. Big Missouri Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Grigsby v. WolvenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Tucker v. FrederickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  5. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Catlett v. EhrlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kirby v. First National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API