Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Ehrler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1916No. File No. 3852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Spink Count}'-. Hon, Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by J. W. Catlett, administrator of the estate -of E. M. Pope, deceased, agains-t George J. Ehrler, to recover money due upon contract. From' an order dissolving an attachment, plaintiff appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Piper v. Wade, 2S S. D. 196; Park v. Armstrong, 9 S. D. 269 ; Jones v. Meyer, 7 S. D. 152; Wyman y.

Read the full summary

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Spink Count}'-. Hon, Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by J. W. Catlett, administrator of the estate -of E. M. Pope, deceased, agains-t George J. Ehrler, to recover money due upon contract. From' an order dissolving an attachment, plaintiff appeals. (1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Piper v. Wade, 2S S. D. 196; Park v. Armstrong, 9 S. D. 269 ; Jones v. Meyer, 7 S. D. 152; Wyman y. Wilmarth, 1 S. D. 172; Tre-■biloock v. Mining Co., 9 S. D. 206; Bark v. Armstrong, 9 S. D. 269. (2) To point two of the opinion, Appellant cited: Rosenberg et al. v.…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Action to recover a balance 'alleged to be due upon a contract for the construction of an electric plant in the city of Conde. At the beginning of the action plaintiff caused an attachment to be levied upon the electric light plant, and also upon certain real estate which had been recently conveyed by defendant. This appeal is from an order dissolving the attachment. The writ of attachment was founded upon an allegation that defendant had assigned and disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors, and especially the plaintiff. The motion to dissolve was upon a specific denial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trebilcock v. Big Missouri Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wyman v. WilmarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. First Nat. Bank v. McMillanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Park v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Germam Bank v. FoldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Hecla v. MichaelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API