Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Arturo

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 6, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Albert Koch, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the charges against him of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25) on the grounds that the People were not ready for trial within 90 days of the commencement of the action as required by CPL 30.30 (subd 1, par [b]). Defendant argues that all periods of time from commencement of an action by a misdemeanor complaint until its conversion to a misdemeanor information by the filing of a corroborative affidavit must, as a matter of law, be chargeable to the People.

The People claim that if conversion is completed within 90 days of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HarvinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  2. People v. RichbergCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  3. People v. WhetsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. People v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. RanieriCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API