Legal Opinion
McKinney v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1949No. 11910PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, District Judge.
The appellant was convicted after trial before a jury upon each of two counts of an information charging unlawful possession and concealment with intent to defraud of a certain falsely altered obligation of the United States, to-wit: split Federal Reserve notes, the first count referring to a split fifty dollar note and the second count to a split twenty dollar note, each count charging that the respective “note had been split by separating the face or front from the back or reverse side thereof.”
From a judgment of conviction on both counts and identical sentences to run…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Manuel Ray Rua, Jr., A/K/A John T. Welk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Harold DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Howard Wallace Barbee and Bobby Joe Manziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Fay Clinton Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.