Ward v. Pullman Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 71. — ACTION BY SAMUEL J. WARD AGAINST THE PULLMAN COMPANY. Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Common Law and Equity Division). M. L. Harbeson, Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Settle
Reversing.
Appellant brought this action to- recover of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company and the appellee, the Pullman Company, damages for being deprived of the services of his son, Joel Ward, during the latter’s minority, resulting from the loss of both of his feet and a part of his *555legs, alleged to have been caused by the gross negligence of the two corporations named; the Pullman Company in constructing and furnishing the railway company for its use, and the railway company in requiring appellant’s son as a brakeman in its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Simons v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- King v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Heindirk v. Louisville Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Olds Motor Works v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Flaherty v. HelfontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
- Graham v. John R. Watts & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Payton's Administrator v. Childers' Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Foster v. Ford Motor CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.