Souza v. Estate of Bishop
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs separately own two single family residences located on leased property owned by the Bishop Estate in Hawaii. In what appears to be a novel theory under the antitrust laws,1 plaintiffs have alleged: that the Bishop Estate has unlawfully monopolized the market for leaseholds by im*1329posing a lease-only system on consumers of single family residences; that the Bishop Estate, the Castle defendants, and other major landowners in Hawaii have illegally conspired to restrain trade in the single family residential leasehold market in Honolulu’s “urban corridor”; and that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Illinois Corporate Travel, Inc., D/B/A McTravel Travel Services, Plaintiff v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Hennegan v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.