Legal Opinion
Hennegan v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.
District Court, D. Guam
Decided March 31, 1987No. Civ. 83-0040PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
DUEÑAS, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court on defendants’ 1 motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs, Thomas J. and Gloria Hennegan, husband and wife (hereinafter the “Hennegans”), are park vendors who sell goods to Japanese tourists in Guam. Defendants consist of five tour operators and two retail stores in Guam whose businesses are aimed primarily at Japanese tourists.
The Hennegans allege that the retail shops pay the tour operators to bring groups of tourists to their stores by bus at pre-arranged times and encourage tourists to make purchases in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peter Harris v. Duty Free Shoppers Limited Partnership, DefendantappelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Attorney General v. GutierrezSuperior Court of Guam · 2009