Legal Opinion

Shaw v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2000No. 99-6152PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal is from an Order granting the United States’ Motion to Quash a Writ of Garnishment brought by plaintiff-appellant Debra Shaw. The Writ was for the recovery of a judgment for attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and costs awarded after the successful prosecution of consolidated False Claims Act (“FCA”) qui tam and wrongful discharge actions. See 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(2), (h). Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms the order of the district court quashing the Writ. In so doing, we hold that (1) Congress did not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. King of the Mountain Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. KuykendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Aryai v. Forfeiture Support Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Purvis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API