Legal Opinion

Michels v. Hodges

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1998No. CC 58-93-07683; CA A88794; SC S44137PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this adoption proceeding under ORS chapter 109, the issue before the court is whether adoptive parents may plead and prove, as a substitute for the consent of one of the birth parents, that grounds for termination of the parental rights of that birth parent exist under ORS chapter 419B. The trial court held that proof of grounds for termination under ORS chapter 419B is a lawful alternative to parental consent and, having found grounds for termination under both ORS 419B.504 and 419B.506, the trial court allowed the adoption to proceed without the consent of, and over the objections of,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. SIMONS ET UX v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Williams Et Ux. v. CapparelliOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Moody v. VoorhiesOregon Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. C. R. H. v. B. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API