Legal Opinion

Nebraska Central Building & Loan Ass'n v. Yellowstone, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1942No. 31177PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This cause is now before us on motion for rehearing. The opinion heretofore adopted is reported in 140 Neb. 422, 299 N. W. 474, reference to which is made for a statement of the issues and facts involved.

In construing statutes this court must first determine whether the legislation is prohibited by the Constitution, and must then determine the intention of the legislature. The constitutionality of the controlling enactments is not here challenged, so we are concerned only in ascertaining the legislative intent. Updike v. City of Omaha, 87 Neb. 228, 127 N. W. 229.

The basic contention of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nebraska District of Evangelical Lutheran Synod v. McKelvieNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Marrow v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Updike v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Love v. CosgraveNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sullivan v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Licking v. Hays Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James V. Bradley, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0392102. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API