Costello v. Schult
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
Two essential questions are presented: Whether, upon defendants’ appeal, we should reverse the order changing the answer to question 2(b) of the verdict, and whether, upon plaintiff’s motion to review, we should hold that the court erroneously reduced the award for pecuniary loss.
The highway at the scene of the accident runs in a generally easterly and westerly direction. Schult’s home is on the south side thereof and his driveway intersects it at a right angle. To the west of-the driveway the highway curves to the southwest. At a point about 56 feet west of the driveway there was a sign…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Campbell v. SutliffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Risch v. LawheadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Gerlach v. GruettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Shearer v. PringleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Vande Hei v. Vande HeiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Wing v. DeppeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Thomas v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Thomas v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954