Legal Opinion

Butler v. Turco

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 30, 2018No. AC 17-P-814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeade, J.

*344 *81 The plaintiffs, Brian Butler and Owen McCants, inmates supervised by the Massachusetts Department of Correction (department) and housed at MCI-Norfolk, each brought actions pro se challenging the consequences imposed on them pursuant to the department's "Program Engagement Strategy" (PES). The defendants filed motions to dismiss both complaints, which were allowed by two different judges. The plaintiffs appeal, alleging what we construe to be 3 various constitutional infirmities in the PES program. We consolidated the cases for hearing in this court, and now affirm.

Background . PES program…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Negron v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
  2. Roby v. SuperintendentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API