Legal Opinion

Woodley v. Zeman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1913No. Gen. No. 18,133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PresidiNg Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case recovery was had, after a trial before the court and a jury, for the balance due under a contract between the parties for the mason work upon a building, the amount being fixed by the final certificate of the architect. The case has had one review in this court, — "Woodley v. Zeman, 159 Ill. App. 412.

The first point urged for reversal is based on the claim that the plaintiff did not perform his contract. The contract provided for the furnishing of materials and performing all the mason work for a “three-story and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  2. Woodley v. ZemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Beckers v. City of KankakeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  3. Morton v. Imperial Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Rugg v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Bird v. TrenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API