Kym Lobzun v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
The Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) seized a large sum of currency from plaintiff-appellant Kym Lobzun, and after sending Lobzun notice of intention to forfeit the money, declared the property forfeited. Lobzun then filed a motion seeking the return of the property on the ground that the notice provided by the government prior to the forfeiture was constitutionally inadequate. The district court denied the motion, finding that the notice satisfied due process. Lobzun appeals, and for the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
I. Background
On September 3, 2003, DEA agents…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Marcial L. Chairez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tidwell v. Smith (In Re Smith)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Peter Akemann v. Patrick J. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- McDonald v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Gates v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.