Legal Opinion
Hare v. Paleo Data, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 2012No. 2011-CA-1034PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
hAnn Hare, a former employee of defendant Paleo Data, Inc., complains on appeal that the trial court, because it failed to recognize the presence of genuine issues of material fact, erred in granting Paleo Data’s motion for partial summary judgment and in dismissing with prejudice her lawsuit against her former employer.1 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and conclude that the trial court did not err when it dismissed with prejudice Mrs. Hare’s claims for hostile work environment and constructive discharge. Because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Favrot v. FavrotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Denise NASH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELECTROSPACE SYSTEM, INC. and John Sharp, Individually, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Plummer v. Marriott Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Johnson v. Mount Pilgrim Baptist ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lewis v. Jazz Casino Co., L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Davis v. Cheema, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hooper v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Serou v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Iteld v. Four Corners Construction L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.