Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamilton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 25, 1973No. 1161-1Published

1DissentHorowitz, C.J.

(dissenting) — I agree the trial court was required to submit this case to the jury on the issues of *189negligence and want of good faith in the sense required. When an insurer, in conformity with its liability insurance policy, takes over the insured’s defense of a claim insured against, the claim being for an amount in excess of policy limits, the insurer must exercise “ ‘that degree of skill, judgment, and consideration for the welfare of the insured which it, as a skilled professional defender of lawsuits having sole charge of the investigation, settlement, and trial of the suit’ ” would be…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. LouieWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API