Northwestern Consol. Milling Co. v. Mauser
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.1
The demurrer to the bill has been disposed of by the amendments, leaving nothing in the way of a consideration of the present motion on its merits.
The complainants are engaged in the manufacture of flour, at Minneapolis, Minn., and have adopted and duly registered as a trademark the word “Ceresota” for a brand of flour which they put out, by which, by judicious advertising, at large expense, it has come to be extensively and favorably known. The defendants are also in the flour business, at Catasaqua, JPa., and make use of the word “Cressota” on a brand of their…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Feil v. American Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Allen v. Walker & GibsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
- Clorox Chemical Co. v. Chlorit Mfg. CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Jell-Well Dessert Co. v. Jell-X-Cell Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Avenarius v. KornelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.