Legal Opinion

People v. Handzik

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1951No. 31906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Plaintiff in error, E. O. Handzik, also known as Esther O. Hankzik, was tried and convicted of a violation of the Medical Practice Act upon information filed in the county court of Cook County. She comes here directly from that court by writ of error to review the verdict of the jury and the sentence to pay a fine of $500. Direct review lies to this court because she directly challenged the constitutionality of sections 24, 36, and 37 of this act in the lower court and has properly preserved those questions for review here.

It appears from the evidence that plaintiff in error, who will be…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kettles v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. The People v. SaltisIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People Ex Rel. Courtney v. PrystalskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. CloseIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Winters v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API