Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Kendall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 21, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.

In the first of these cases McNeil, the plaintiff, as assignee under a levy of sale of the leasehold estates of Samuel T. Ames, created under certain indentures from Lucy Ann Harris, seeks to recover rent from the defendants, to whom Samuel T. Ames had leased, prior to the sale, a portion of the premises included in the indentures.

In the second case James B. Ames, the plaintiff, contends that the lease from Samuel T. Ames to the defendants operated in law as an assignment of his entire term in the premises described therein, and not as an underlease; and that there was no estate Dr reversion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davenport v. New England Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  2. Peck v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Dennis v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Sanders v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Delano v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dunlap v. BullardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Marcelle, Inc. v. Sol. & S. Marcus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Taylor v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Indian Refining Co. v. Mary G. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API