Russell v. Nikon, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court after court-annexed arbitration, under ORS 36.400 to 36.425, of plaintiffs claims against defendant Nikon, Inc. The arbitrator ruled in defendant’s favor on the merits of plaintiffs claims and awarded defendant costs and attorney fees. Plaintiff filed exceptions in the trial court, arguing that the award of attorney fees was erroneous because defendant did not submit a sufficiently detailed fee statement pursuant to ORCP 68; the statement did not itemize the services provided by defendant’s counsel. Defendant conceded that its fee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- H.N.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Parker v. ScharbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Foust v. American Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferguson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Russell v. Nikon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- East County Recycling, Inc. v. Pneumatic Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Plum v. LibrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Gall v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2007