Cedar Rapids National Bank v. American Surety Co. of New York
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentPrestoN, C. J.
With all due respect for tbe opinion of tlie majority, I cannot bring’ myself to tbe point-of concurring in the majority opinion. I therefore respectfully dissent.
Under the undisputed evidence in the case, I think that Boyer was guilty of larceny, rather than of obtaining money under false pretenses. I shall state my reasons as briefly as I can.
Under the authorities, it is sometimes difficult to determine whether, under a given state of facts, a party is guilty of larceny or of false pretense. I am inclined to think that, in some cases, a situation might be such as to involve either one. 17…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- People v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Loomis v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- State v. ReiffWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Slaughter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1905
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.