United States v. Flowers
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This litigation, United States v. Flowers, civil action no. 2:68cv2709-T (previously styled United States v. Frazer, and still frequently known today as “Frazer” or the “Frazer litigation”), is before the court on the difficult issue of what discovery, if any, the court should allow before it decides whether Frazer’s 35-year-old “no-bypass rule” should be terminated.
I
Paragraph 3 of § II of the 1970 injunction in Frazer provides as follows:
“Defendants shall not appoint or offer a position to a lower-ranking white applicant on a certificate in preference…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McDonald's Corp. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Garcia-Mir v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. HaleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Rogers v. HaleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- United States v. FlowersDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006