Legal Opinion
Robert Blaik v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 4, 1998No. 94-8323PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, BIRCH, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge. GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellant Robert Blaik moved the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to correct the restitution portion of his sentence. The district court denied his motion. We originally reversed the lower court’s denial and vacated the restitution portion of his sentence, but after further study we now grant the government’s petition for rehearing. Our previously published opinion in Blaik v. U.S., 117 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir.1997), is vacated. This opinion is entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Diane Barnickel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Joe Clinton SeglerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Barrett N. Weinberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- John F. Kaminski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. John Herman ThieleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Bernard Barney KramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. David MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.