Legal Opinion

Ashton v. Whitman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 15, 2004No. 03-3476UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants in this case, Lawrence R. Ashton, Sr., Lawrence R. Ashton, Jr., Samuel M. Curio, and Dennis R. Forand, are current and former officials of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (the “DOC”) at Bayside State Prison (“Bay-side”). Each of the Appellants was the subject of disciplinary proceedings in connection with allegedly improper activities at Bayside. Each of the Appellants, however, entered into a settlement with the DOC in which all disciplinary charges were dropped. After the disciplinary proceedings were terminated, Appellants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Temple Univ.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Rasa Floors, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Asarkakasaamsu v. FirstBank Puerto RicoDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2020
  4. Tucker Birkhead v. Downingtown Area School District, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API