Legal Opinion

In Re Hartley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1947No. Calendar No. 43,540PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Tbe Honorable George B. Hartrick is one of tbe circuit judges of tbe sixth judicial circuit duly assigned to conduct, under tbe provisions of 3 Comp. Laws of 1929, §§ 17217 to 17220 (Stat. Ann. §§28.943 to 28.946), a so-called onerman grand jury investigation of alleged gambling and corruption of public officials in Oakland county.

In the course of the investigation it was discovered that the plaintiff, Leo Hartley, was the owner of certain pinball machines operated throughout the county of Oakland, which were suspected of having been used for gambling purposes. It was further discovered that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AppelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  2. Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re SlatteryMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In re WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. In Re OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. In Re OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Scholle v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API