Legal Opinion

CRST v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

Employer CRST petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the denial of employer’s modification petition. This case presents the issue of whether employer is entitled to a further modification of benefits based on a labor market survey which indicates a higher earning power than the actual wages claimant receives for two positions which he secured on his own after receiving a Notice of Ability to Return to Work1 and before being advised of any positions described in the labor market survey.2 For the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Allied Products & Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Korol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Brown v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crst v. Wcab (Boyles)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. The Pennsylvania State University and The PMA Insurance Group v. WCAB (Hockenbury)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API