Legal Opinion
Minch v. Saymon
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 24, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
96 N.J. Super. 464 (1967)
233 A.2d 385
JOSEPH A. MINCH AND MARIE MINCH, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CATHERINE E. SAYMON, WIDOW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided July 24, 1967.
Mr. Aristo Dallavalle, attorney for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Sauer & Kervick, attorneys for defendants (Mr. James F. Kervick, appearing).
HERBERT, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs have sued for relief against a covenant which by its terms limits the use of their property to a residential site for no more than three families. The property is at 20 Riverside Drive in Cranford and has a frontage of approximately…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Welitoff v. KohlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Caparrelli v. Rolling Greens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Klein v. Sisters of Charity of Saint ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Hemsley v. Marlborough House Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Shaff v. LeylandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Willingboro Country Club, Inc. v. Levitt & Sons, Inc. (In Re Willingboro Country Club, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007