Legal Opinion
Patton's Heirs v. Moseley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 4, 1937No. 33912PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs, being the owners in possession of certain lands in Lincoln parish, brought this suit in jactitation against parties claiming ownership of undivided mineral rights in the lands. Wilson v. Pierson, 143 La. 287, 78 So. 561; Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Sailing’s Heirs, 150 La. 756, 91 So. 207.
Plaintiffs are the heirs of T. F. Patton, who, on October 1, 1925, and on December 10, 1925, sold the undivided mineral rights in dispute to R. O. Roy. On May 1, 1935, Roy sold the undivided mineral rights thus acquired to the Acme Land & Investment Company, Inc., of which he was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Sample v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Palmer Corporation of Louisiana v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Pulford v. DimmickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Walker v. FortSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. FutralSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Liberty Farms, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Verret v. NorwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Savoie v. BillsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.