Legal Opinion

Cook v. Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2008No. 06-99005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Daniel Wayne Cook appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Cook waived counsel and represented himself at trial through sentencing. A jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree murder and the court sentenced him to death under Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-503 and 13-703. Cook now claims that his decision to waive counsel was involuntary because his original appointed trial counsel was ineffective; that his co-defendant, John Eugene Matzke’s plea agreement violated Cook’s right to a fair trial; and that the prosecutor improperly commented…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wooten v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Johnson v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Date v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Fonseca v. HallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  5. Beltran v. DexterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API