Legal Opinion

Beesley v. Hanish

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 6, 1987No. 761, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.

Originally owned and developed by Martingham Inn, Inc. (M.I.I.), Martingham is a pleasant, semi-rural subdivision located just outside St. Michaels in Talbot County, Mary land. Section No. Three of Martingham encompasses, among others, 15 inland lots, namely, lots 25 through 31 and lots 33 through 40. These lots surround four acres called the pond parcel although there is no pond presently located there. This case is about a suit in the Circuit Court for Talbot County by the owners of lots 25 and 39, the Hanishes and the Kroegers, respectively, appellees, for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Parker v. Board of Election SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Bargale Industries, Inc. v. Robert Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Cook v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Boucher Investments, L.P. v. Annapolis-West Limited PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Hiltz v. HiltzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Estate of Kitchin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API