Legal Opinion

Coley v. Philadelphia District Attorney's Office

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 2013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.1

Charles Coley appeals, pro se, an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) that denied Coley’s request for records under the Right-to-Know Law.2 Coley sought access to rec*696ords compiled by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office during a criminal investigation that resulted in Coley’s arrest and conviction for murder. The trial court held that the requested records were exempt from disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law because, inter alia, the Criminal History Record Information Act prohibits their disclosure.3 For the reasons that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. SWB YANKEES LLC v. WintermantelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Stein v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. SWB YANKEES LLC v. Gretchen WintermantelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Mitchell v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Pennsylvania State Police v. GroveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Barros v. MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In re: Appeal of Bochetto & Lentz ~ From the Decision of the Appeals Officer Philadelphia D.A.'s Office ~ Appeal of: Philadelphia D.A.'s OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. J. Moore v. Allegheny County District Attorney's OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API