Legal Opinion

Huddleston v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1963No. 37525PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

Theodore Huddleston, while employed as a foreman by the Maury Weinzelbaum Decorating Company was severely injured when assaulted by Howard Hall, another employee, at a job site near Chicago, and Huddleston thereafter filed a claim for benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The arbitrator found that Huddleston had suffered a ten percent permanent loss of the use of his right leg and awarded him the total sum of $1643.22, but, upon further hearing, the Industrial Commission set aside the award and dismissed the claim. The circuit court of Cook County, however, reversed the findings of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Country Club, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Math Igler's Casino, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Edelweiss Gardens v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Chicago Hardware Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brewster Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Laboy v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Malco, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API