Legal Opinion

People v. Teague

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 7, 1980No. 79-79PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

In this case, the defendant, James Teague, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Kankakee County dismissing, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended petition for post conviction relief. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

From the record it appears that two weeks prior to the defendant’s indictment for the offenses of aggravated kidnapping, rape, and deviate sexual assault, the defendant’s then attorney, William Eaken, moved for a hearing on the subject of the defendant’s fitness to stand trial pursuant to section 5 — 2—1 of the Unified Code of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. SkorusaIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. The PEOPLE v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. GoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. LeikerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API