Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Pettingell-Andrews Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided May 7, 1907No. 201PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The bill charges infringement of letters patent No. 78-1,695, issued March I t, 1905, to Norman Marshall, for an insulating lining. The claims in suit are:
“(5) An insulating-lining consisting of a paper tube having its diameter reduced for a portion of its length, substantially as described.”
“(9) The combination with a metallic shell, of an insulating-sleeve consisting of an elastic, compressible paxier tube held in frictional engagement with the shell by its own resiliency.”
Each claim uses the term “paper tube,” upon which are based the principal distinctions from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- General Electric Co. v. Yost Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- General Electric Co. v. Yost Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- Perry v. Revere Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. ForsythU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. General Railway Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Marshall v. Bryant Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911
- Bryant Electric Co. v. MarshallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- Dupont v. Dennison Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
- Marshall v. WirtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916