Legal Opinion

Parlato v. State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 5, 1988No. 80, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

On February 17, 1983, Charles F. Parlato, the appellant, filed a complaint with the Maryland Commission on Human Relations (the Commission) in which he alleged that his employer, Abbott Laboratories, had discharged him because of race and age in violation of Md.Code Ann., Art. 49B, § 16(a). After receiving the complaint, the Commission pursuant to Art. 49B, § 10 instituted a preliminary investigation to determine whether appellant’s claim was color-able, justifying further administrative action against Abbott Laboratories.

That investigation revealed that Parlato, a 55 year old…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Soley v. State Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n v. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Stoddard v. State Merchant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Rowe v. Md. Comm'n on Civil RightsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Holmes v. RobinsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API