Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Laske
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 17, 1999No. 98-1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
751 So.2d 82 (1999)
Marvin I. HOROWITZ & Horowitz & Gudeman, P.C., Appellant,
v.
Edward LASKE & Ruth E. Laske, etc., Appellees.
No. 98-1944.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 17, 1999.
Philip D. Parrish of Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Robert E. Austin, Jr. and Bradford D. Fisher of Austin & Pepperman, P.A., Leesburg, for Appellees.
THOMPSON, J.
Marvin Horowitz, a Michigan attorney, and Horowitz & Gudeman, P.C. (collectively, "Horowitz"), a Michigan law firm, third-party defendants below, appeal from a non-final order denying a motion to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- John Madara v. Daryl HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Doe v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Unger v. PUBLISHER ENTRY SERVICEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Dinsmore v. Martin Blumenthal Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wendt v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Acquadro v. BergeronSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Horowitz v. LaskeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Norvel Ltd. v. Ulstein Propeller AsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Law Offices of Sybil Shainwald v. BarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002