Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kling

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 21, 1994No. Civ. 93 CV 74440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carlos A. Williams, an inmate at the State Prison of Southern Michigan (“SPSM”), brought this action informa pau-peris, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that actions taken by prison officials violated Plaintiffs constitutional rights and violated state law. This case is now before the court on cross motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I

Summary judgment should be granted by this Court as a matter of law if it is shown that no genuine issue as to material facts…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rienholtz v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  2. Ishaaq v. ComptonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  3. Brown v. CarpenterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. Anderson v. SundquistDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998
  5. Carlos A. Williams v. Carol KlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API