Legal Opinion

Keller v. City of Bellingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1979No. 45882PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This appeal challenges a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, upholding the trial court's determination that improvements made by the Georgia-Pacific Corporation (GP) to its chlor-alkali plant do not constitute unlawful "enlargement" of a nonconforming use under the Bellingham zoning ordinance. The facts are set forth with considerable particularity in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Keller v. Bellingham, 20 Wn. App. 1, 578 P.2d 881 (1978). We affirm the Court of Appeals.

In 1965, GP constructed a chlor-alkali facility in an industrial section of Bellingham zoned as a "heavy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Anderson v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Standard Mining & Development Corp. v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Coburn v. SedaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Valley View Industrial Park v. City of RedmondWashington Supreme Court · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API