Legal Opinion

Milin v. United States Lines, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

If a seaman or longshoreman be injured by the unseaworthiness of a vessel, hi^ action against the shipowner is governed by Federal maritime common law, and liability is “ absolute ” (Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, 362 U. S. 539; Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn, 346 U. S. 406). “ It is a form of absolute duty owing to all within the range of its humanitarian policy ” (Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 328 U. S. 85, 94, 95). This liability is independent of Federal statutory responsibility (Mitchell, 362 U. S. 539, 549) and, as Justice Stewart there wrote for the court, there “is a complete divorcement of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitford A. Rice v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Fitzgerald v. American Trading & Production Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API