Legal Opinion

Neuhring v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Gallioun District Court.— Hon. Z. . A. Church, Judge. Action in equity for an injunction to restrain the construction and maintenance of a surface water drain. On hearing, the court dismissed the petition and rendered judgment in favor of defendant for costs. Plaintiff appeals.- — •

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of the E. y% of the S. E. y±, section 20, township 88, range 34, in Calhoun county. Defendant is the owner of the N. y¿ of said section, and also the S. % of the S. W. x/4 of section 17, said township and range. Section 17 lies immediately to the north of section 20. Plaintiff’s ownership- dates from the year 1899. Prior thereto, and antedating the year 1892, ownership was in one 'Cox. Defendant’s ownership antedates the year 1892. Located on the S. E. % of section 17, owned by one Cassavaw, is a natural depression of many acres in extent, and in its natural state water…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vannest v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Hull v. HarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Williamson v. OlesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fulton v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Nixon v. WelchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Brown v. HoneyfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Valentine v. WidmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Halsrud v. BrodaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API