Legal Opinion

Trum v. Melvin Pierce Marine Coating, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1990No. 89-215PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Dick Trum, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Melvin Pierce Marine Coating, Inc.; Melvin Pierce Painting, Inc.; and Melvin Pierce, individually, in this action seeking damages for breach of contract and fraud. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Initially, we note that a summary judgment was proper in this case only if there was no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), A.R.Civ.P. In determining whether there was a genuine issue of material fact, this Court must review the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Clanton v. Bains Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Miller v. Mobile County Bd. of HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Durham v. HarbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Dean v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. US Diagnostic, Inc. v. Shelby Radiology, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Newsome v. KWANGSUNG AMERICA, CORP.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API