Trum v. Melvin Pierce Marine Coating, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Dick Trum, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Melvin Pierce Marine Coating, Inc.; Melvin Pierce Painting, Inc.; and Melvin Pierce, individually, in this action seeking damages for breach of contract and fraud. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Initially, we note that a summary judgment was proper in this case only if there was no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), A.R.Civ.P. In determining whether there was a genuine issue of material fact, this Court must review the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Clanton v. Bains Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Miller v. Mobile County Bd. of HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Durham v. HarbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Dean v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Rath v. Selection Research, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- US Diagnostic, Inc. v. Shelby Radiology, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Newsome v. KWANGSUNG AMERICA, CORP.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.