Legal Opinion

Smith v. Traders National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1891No. 3112PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellee to recover upon a promissory note for $7000, charged to have been made payable to the order of the Texas Investment Company, Limited, by J. P. Smith and the firm of Fore, Morphy & Henderson, composed of Walker Fore, W. J. Morphy, and R. M. Henderson.

The death of Fore was suggested, and the cause was dismissed as to him. There was a verdict in favor of the defendant Henderson, and a judgment upon a verdict against the defendants Smith and Morphy. The defendant Smith alone prosecutes this appeal.

The defense of Smith was in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Brown v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Shepard v. GiddingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  4. Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Johnson v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spaulding v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Lindsay v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API