Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. John Carlo Texas, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1993No. D-1404PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

The only issues we address in this case concern the trial court’s charge to the jury on intentional interference with contract.

The City of Houston notified Southwestern Bell Telephone Company in January 1984 that it intended to widen Fountain-view Drive between Westheimer and Highway 59. A City Ordinance provided:

The telephone company shall, upon the written request of the City, relocate its facilities situated within any street at no expense to the City where reasonable and necessary to accommodate street widening or improvement projects of the City.

Before contracting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Clements v. WithersTexas Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. HawleyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation v. Henry Andrew Hansen, II, M.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Amanda Culbertson v. Pat LykosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API