Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1983No. 82-557PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

After trial to the court without a jury the defendant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to 2 years’ probation, with 30 days to be served in jail as a condition of probation. The defendant has appealed.

The sole assignment of error on appeal is that the District Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a search warrant. The contention is that the affidavit for the search warrant was insufficient.

On January 26, 1982, an affidavit and application for the issuance of the search warrant involved here were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. RobishNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BenlienMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. DuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. CroninNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API