Legal Opinion
D. Ioven v. Chief T. Nestel and SEPTA
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2016No. 543 C.D. 2016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SENIOR JUDGE FRIEDMAN
Douglas Ioven appeals from the November 17, 2015, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) that granted the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Chief Thomas Nestel and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) (together, Appellees) and dismissed Ioven’s complaint with prejudice. We affirm.
Nestel is the chief of police for SEPTA. Ioven, a former SEPTA employee, filed a complaint against Appellees alleging that Nestel published and distributed to various law enforcement agencies, an Officer Safety Bulletin…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- La Frankie v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kull v. GuisseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Holt v. Northwest Pennsylvania Training Partnership Consortium, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Goldman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M. Mazur v. J. CuthbertCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- BURLEY v. CO FRITZDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- D. Harris & S. Thompson v. SEPTA Police Det. D. BurgmannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- JAGER v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Keith Vernon Davis v. Barry Smith, et al.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.