Legal Opinion

Major v. Collins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

We are constrained to reverse the decree of the court below on the ground that it provides for a sale of the premises in sólido, without making an apportionment of the burden to be borne by each house and lot, and ordering a sale of each separately. Section 22 of the Mechanic’s Lien Law provides: “If any part of the premises can be separated from the residue and sold without damage to the whole, and if the value thereof is sufficient to satisfy all the claims proved in the cause, the court may order a sale of that part.”

The petitioner avers that Collins agreed to furnish the materials and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. People ex rel. StoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Steigleman v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weber v. BushnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Weber v. BushnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API