Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1962No. 5-2857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The issues to be decided on this appeal emanate from an attempt to partition land in which appellant (a minor) held an undivided one-half interest in fee and appellee held a dower interest. One Henderson Smith was the owner of the land at the time of his death in 1942. Appellant is his grandson and appellee is his widow. Appellant is eighteen years old and has at all pertinent times been represented by a guardian who is his mother.

Stripped of the maze of pleadings and legal maneuvers, the real issues to be decided are as hereafter set out.

One. Appellant contends…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krickerberg v. HoffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Branstetter v. BranstetterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Evans v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Looney v. LooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Doss v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API