Legal Opinion

Honeycutt Ex Rel. Phillips v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 23, 1990No. 64,179PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, C.J.:

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Sedgwick County District Court, finding as a matter of law that the six-year-old plaintiff, Jeremy Honeycutt, could not be comparatively at fault because of his age and granting partial summary judgment. Defendants, the City of Wichita, U.S.D. No. 259, Union Pacific Railroad Corporation, and Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., appeal.

The issue for our decision is whether the negligence of a young child is a question of fact or whether a child below a certain age is incapable of negligence as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Simmons v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Martell v. DriscollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API